Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:53:01 +0000
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: Matthew Martin <phy1729@gmail.com>
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: [patch] _init_d add OpenBSD bits
Message-ID: <20160123235301.GD20278@tarsus.local2>
References: <20160110190157.GA4187@CptOrmolo.darkstar>
 <20160113005734.GA24858@tarsus.local2>
 <20160121193134.GA25505@CptOrmolo.darkstar>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160121193134.GA25505@CptOrmolo.darkstar>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Seq: zsh-workers 37750

Matthew Martin wrote on Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 13:31:34 -0600:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:57:34AM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Surely these should be single quotes around the last argument?
> 
> Updated diff after a few more comments from Daniel.

Thanks for the patch, applied.

It doesn't complete subcommand names after -f or -d, is that expected
behaviour?  (It's because _sub_commands checks CURRENT.)