Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79026d00000418a-c8-56a64b867b67
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:21:23 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Glitch with "eval" and "autoload"
Message-id: <20160125162123.54b1001a@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <160125081435.ZM16717@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <160123100311.ZM14575@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20160124152235.5e088b74@ntlworld.com> <20160124171708.75438e31@ntlworld.com>
 <160125081435.ZM16717@torch.brasslantern.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7pt3svCDObPlbU42PyQyYHRY9XB
	D0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGUd/TGUqmMhc8fDMfaYGxu1MXYycHBICJhK3ll1lgbDFJC7c
	W8/WxcjFISSwlFHi6pKJzBDODCaJ/ic3wDqEBM4xSlx6WwWROMsocW9uM1ALBweLgKrE4c0p
	IDVsAoYSUzfNZgSxRQTEJc6uPQ+2QVhAT+Lilb1gNq+AvcSBNyfAbE4BK4kly2cwQszcySgx
	5c9CVpAEv4C+xNW/n6BOtZeYeeUMI0SzoMSPyffAmpkFtCQ2b2tihbDlJTavecsMcai6xI27
	u9knMArPQtIyC0nLLCQtCxiZVzGKppYmFxQnpeca6hUn5haX5qXrJefnbmKEhPOXHYyLj1kd
	YhTgYFTi4bVQWxomxJpYVlyZe4hRgoNZSYT3P9+yMCHelMTKqtSi/Pii0pzU4kOM0hwsSuK8
	c3e9DxESSE8sSc1OTS1ILYLJMnFwSjUwrtFUe6nD36pUnfX3W4ThfWexO/OS0idvWrLvVKGV
	4avmPM2/Ny+ot0c08TVy3HvqMWETx57P+3YzhGfG/F5/5MweidrcZ3NXxjefmnuKY8axjj1m
	E51ufQxQ2Oa+YJ7hHdXPKwIem8puuOXRn5I7V8iTl8s/0irpnmK6Uuaqr/YzE4TfXTw6W4ml
	OCPRUIu5qDgRAFM4cehjAgAA
X-Seq: zsh-workers 37779

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 08:14:35 -0800
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On Jan 24,  5:17pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> }
> } > You shouldn't need to check the name, rather look for (fstpr->tp ==
> } > FS_FUNC).  That ought to be fairly robust.
> 
> The patch in 37765 looks fine to me, do you plan to push it?

Yes, I'll do it here otherwise it'll be tomorrow evening...

pws