Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; 
	h=from:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; 
	s=smtpapi; bh=sUNyOU02RwvwISuwdFj6PpAyV18=; b=OleiKP8/WgshX6nqsk
	fV6Tsqroz2SggY/zzBHmbfd8phlDSU0+7T/w+58tC6HPvB1tURkG3m2ucsOp3Bei
	IfmyoAE40fQi0Fc8XxOI7AONdgGtbg3Zkca92rsONsCd7CoZDkq28ofxZRbl+qhe
	e9l8/IQEMVQjlitMt0opXENJQ=
From: Greg Klanderman <gak@klanderman.net>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: ZSH_SCRIPT
Reply-To: Greg Klanderman <gak@klanderman.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:59:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20160225093344.0d2499d5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> (Peter Stephenson's message of "Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:33:44 +0000")
Message-ID: <87r3g08ycp.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux)
References: <22221.59800.803540.618862@lwm.klanderman.net>
	<160224143153.ZM28994@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20160225093344.0d2499d5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SG-EID: i+zOheVB0lMUqP0z3X/8PPLe+C1hDfxH7g5ommK/LCqkVs1iM0pI4z38jHW1MoAgO8Zvuz/BVivxcp
 gbH0YkBptW1OhkVpfzeKEw4tqL+QVBsu15w2t7wfM81V/c7XnZwDQch3FJ9okX8LJhCK0l5W78o6a/
 sH3r7TzYjbVc+Q+pPdh/WCbAaOR0soJVc32Av5c5C6VWXjJcDxfx9RYWsQ==
X-Seq: zsh-workers 38028

>>>>> On February 25, 2016 Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com> wrote:

> The variable is new --- we could have a different one to make the POSIX
> $0 permanently available.

Hi Peter and Bart,

Are you saying this is new enough that it can still be changed?  I
would be OK leaving it, and adding another variable as I had
originally proposed, but I do think that ZSH_SCRIPT is a bit better
name for what I had originally proposed, i.e. the name of the script
or empty, and that something like ZSH_ARGZERO might be better for what
is currently called ZSH_SCRIPT.

LKM what you prefer, and if you want me to submit a patch.

thank you,
Greg

