Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=from:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpapi; bh=TX2c+3nFPmuRd2iNvkwCj+9ZjaE=; b=qdUI9nLt+9nXHxlVWd X7fOO4/NaZQqzR6gzY9CpPVz5ZdGTEOL0m7P9mGzRlWs+i/H82amm/OJEwV6QNWs 7FVpa6JlOqGYf3IcSqLzJfdZFGEJ5iv9tP94z6a505dB80hqJX5QTJirghWuEJnO T6E2YceVEyIoilRrsJyh6hU70= From: Greg Klanderman To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: ZSH_SCRIPT Reply-To: Greg Klanderman Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <160225150425.ZM14095@torch.brasslantern.com> (Bart Schaefer's message of "Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:04:25 -0800") Message-ID: <87lh6384y5.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux) References: <22221.59800.803540.618862@lwm.klanderman.net> <160224143153.ZM28994@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160225093344.0d2499d5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <87r3g08ycp.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> <160225150425.ZM14095@torch.brasslantern.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SG-EID: i+zOheVB0lMUqP0z3X/8PPLe+C1hDfxH7g5ommK/LCq/mSZE5eqiQU+F6WEW7JfQ8LuO03Jlj7/x2X +PdpZUFJJRIF2ws7EvE516YvNN7mpnJzwDwV/Lis7IX8xnn33GFA/pt5v93yL0cEvYfT0/3dGHpBiM rUfMhREiURzG1s4OQo1E6IWL13BKT87Hq2wRB2P/jLi4swVW2cAAzto3WmuG4/xrj+xQKrbqp72gOG w= X-Seq: zsh-workers 38052 >>>>> On February 25, 2016 Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Feb 25, 12:59pm, Greg Klanderman wrote: > } > } Are you saying this is new enough that it can still be changed? > That's how I interpret what Peter said, yes. I don't really have any > preference here. OK, Peter what do you prefer? Greg