Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject
         :mime-version;
        bh=ZyDzT1UUqihm7/9HUwWHu24yIbfhlR+MMOY7lGWHUU0=;
        b=UjBL70JUvONyc930ggsZ15C2Ra5MatIXI0T7ONfXhentQPHYVMTaUxVuzDaua4JrO4
         oK8ZdP6qs1Lis1KxOXmRPRHOmcIliCaKWWfAWHpbLUXCTmNJsyS9gJnUStYNaCUxABT2
         6ky8nAaOo1gryRgL8X8L0orMiZygVP203lLCupUdPOSn+KQut6F+6JaiXLxK2eRGgO4P
         lhjOyMWcZQFJl/FvxOoqvRehJFhKVpj57RgRyGo2ugKUEsjFybtMdeD5GLeD+1BIDSE3
         TNPZ9vt/QIX7Rt3bVmFQd8ebantMNTBTOoD54ERIpSHemNHLd23hAXa1XW7cr+tH19wN
         lowg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:to:subject:mime-version;
        bh=ZyDzT1UUqihm7/9HUwWHu24yIbfhlR+MMOY7lGWHUU0=;
        b=TTUIDkUVUR0Yo34wmIFJ5oyEAR1Yk7scbfi/ywJnqQE3mIsnjumN1GNDRPjR6hGm0o
         gHrqwHrr2+eWWj4SpMpbw48x0j+J2HfJVlLjmixkJMNFLiHN/mS9VVeauQGLKMtd8Uuw
         RyME9x+gviGYAcdDKWNNIOX1dnJekYXl1EEkFFoL0D3jVMjWIaBF1wkOhBvJEL43xbqN
         apeUH6jm+utjr8LHUOlTJBkOUSmiGnNif1V4pdsq8bY4GC/tT4ZKsbbxJxIuKJPhUvCi
         luh0c38wGYUgiQPPn/MpJrjD5Or5cK34kDgRDOgSaVGeETwD96W2xPDDbVN/nuuCOjAv
         WUJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLAK5TrTIeUjkB/dJRkhnhX1lBHN8FYU41mojIwEHdjpSNWy+cNzt+U63oRTNYatQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.76.194 with SMTP id e63mr278203pfj.89.1457563497503;
        Wed, 09 Mar 2016 14:44:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <160309144505.ZM11492@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 14:45:05 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAHYJk3R8TJLbSQYqAAJyvYjMZvgy2+W8qkGO9DLyEQmXOGppNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In reply to Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
        "Re: reverse-menu-complete re-starting completion on 5.2?" (Mar  9, 12:41pm)
References: <20160226175937.GA22547@lorien.comfychair.org> 
	<160226114511.ZM17604@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<8456.1456706752@thecus.kiddle.eu> 
	<160306094154.ZM20831@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<CAHYJk3R-gr5C2LTJeXKaW7oUfs49pdPKkj=y3-XCv2dMT7rbcA@mail.gmail.com> 
	<CAHYJk3SbxtRxh6N0WtVfgSf0urCkYyqGG0foEHT72g93E-_hfQ@mail.gmail.com> 
	<CAHYJk3R8TJLbSQYqAAJyvYjMZvgy2+W8qkGO9DLyEQmXOGppNQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: reverse-menu-complete re-starting completion on 5.2?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Seq: zsh-workers 38122

On Mar 9, 12:41pm, Mikael Magnusson wrote:
} Subject: Re: reverse-menu-complete re-starting completion on 5.2?
}
} On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:
} > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:
} >> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
} >>> On Feb 29,  1:45am, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
} >>> }
} >>> } [...] I'm really not sure why we need to be so
} >>> } strict about the completion widget matching the last completion widget.
} >>>
} >>> The only reason I can think of is in case menu completion is invoked from
} >>> within a user-defined widget, or otherwise entered by a different widget
} >>>
} >>> Maybe we'd need another flag action for "zle -f" to continue/interrupt

Turns out "zle auto-suffix-retain" already serves this purpose.

This is tricky because widgets created with "zle -C" start directly in
completion context, which means that "zle" generates an error; i.e., if
we naively stick this into _generic:

    _generic:zle:1: widgets can only be called when ZLE is active

(The error should probably be more specific, since a completion widget is
merely the wrong *kind* of widget.)

The solution is to make a normal widget for auto-suffix-retain, then invoke
the completion widget with "zle the-widget -w".  This seems a bit more work
than should be necessary, but see example below.

} >> I can tell you I quite often complete a directory name using normal
} >> completion, and then press ctrl-n to complete files inside by latest
} >> modification date.
} 
} zstyle ':completion:most-recent-file:*' match-original both
} zstyle ':completion:most-recent-file:*' file-sort modification
} zstyle ':completion:most-recent-file:*' file-patterns '*:all\ files'
} zstyle ':completion:most-recent-file:*' hidden all
} zstyle ':completion:most-recent-file:*' completer _files
} zle -C most-recent-file menu-complete _generic
} 
} bindkey "^N"      most-recent-file

Just as-is, this works as you desire if the initial directory completion
is not ambiguous, but cycles if there are multiple possible matches in
the current menu.

} I would like ^N after TAB to start completion over (even if this was
} originally a ^N completion), but TAB after ^N to continue the same
} completion.

The following uses the normal-widget-calls-completion trick.  There may
be a better name for it.

-- 8< --
# Replaces bindkey in the above, otherwise all the same

complete-most-recent-file () {
  [[ $LASTWIDGET != $WIDGET ]] && zle auto-suffix-retain
  zle most-recent-file -w
}
zle -N complete-most-recent-file

bindkey "^N" complete-most-recent-file
-- 8< --

If we're OK with this, Oliver's patch can remain, but it's possible that
there are other user-defined widgets that will start behaving unexpectedly.

