Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160430012828.GA3334@tarsus.local2>
References: <ufa1t5pl0yg.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu>
	<160429131027.ZM22749@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<ufashy4ghvy.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu>
	<20160430004639.GA1360@tarsus.local2>
	<20160430010131.GA34472@CptOrmolo.darkstar>
	<20160430012828.GA3334@tarsus.local2>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:51:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH+w=7b9kKY1Xr5YHFHMS4YzSptJWwU_N6p+s3R=Q=QjYYSo3w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in C02cont.ztst's -N test
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

We're gong to have to add "useless use of anonymous function" to go
with "useless use of cat".

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Matthew Martin wrote on Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 20:01:31 -0500:
>> +  elif sleep 58; [[ $unmodified_ls == "$(ls -lu $unmodified)" ]]; then
>>
>> but who wants to sleep for 60 seconds? (There's a sleep 2 earlier.)

Is there some magic reason it has to total 60 seconds?

>     elif ! () {
>              repeat 58 {
>                sleep 1
>                if [[ $unmodified_ls != "$(ls -lu $unmodified)" ]]; then return 0; fi
>              }
>              return 1
>            }; then

elif ! repeat 60; do sleep 1; ZTST_hashmark; [[ $unmodified_ls !=
"$(ls -lu $unmodified)" ]] && break; done; then