Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=ObEPxTghLOmiENME+7PPcvjHyoHRBU6W4QxYBeQW7bg=;
        b=bVyDAhyeU4F9NhYBGIVf7ZcCOUSRwksuohzzGMBpmOSaRGAI6kxkgc3LJo1JiAuZRS
         KGVahPQ1qJe2wuc0Bzt28Mu766Dm4XuxYT+uYXuB4RWQ4e1WLEroSBLYaLC0pnbO465y
         aMQYKymjpJ2E+/+tTCMQ2TQq3l7McKrJdqfAI/F2t4fXApLLe6b3Ft+/1NH3M5ie1Zkv
         qMDK0fINYk+qD8QV7UOPwx5sKBy3yg0NC5KUitTRuUBs9OifzHZ2ZYLQESlgeyjcWsCP
         Nj3wLXSR0z1gpCldVgYqii9e0qvemfKeo1zXQoShvA6bgRLpOZbruAzK4HqhX+M9wFrr
         mxPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=ObEPxTghLOmiENME+7PPcvjHyoHRBU6W4QxYBeQW7bg=;
        b=SlJPB3TvmxzJpCsPnVca98EuNkuLBta383d5/ThlTH/mo5bfzmvEdiwQJaNLZjsPTf
         nGpquwCReDoENzDR1gOjAQcW6fawrtfdBxl7n0ujMDscIVQeDd2booNfr8/ntsthuqbM
         hb87RTz8IuzTIdloUpDFOp3n53dQ+zrlK/2nwcQGBy2z250N+lubMoY8LLHsSchuk9F+
         1t8Yr+uX7zXulsEsh6R5T6z7c82FmH14w5iL0EeSSRVwDQSyh0ZOsL/r44crc9KbI1OO
         pLy8bavHxs4uP+d9tn1Ux8tQqxkZ0AmpSCpcpzW0a7nxvfKBmS3QqNJ2+01rYJKLXrDb
         DJ/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUD8O/ikGXysYTvdPeSUXfUJqSvghxBJYdAF23ve/fixLOCwINZAMLd7Q3tLLlGCxQz/zwIs8dF3mfnQA==
X-Received: by 10.112.133.166 with SMTP id pd6mr3048387lbb.125.1463594057321;
 Wed, 18 May 2016 10:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKc7PVDur7MUiaQrQ=Pm35W-8NEnSP5dvmxXY4V9s3rL9mojDg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKc7PVCZhyjPqzgPSrKOUs=+Qp5m_yELs2uEAwuCQYZXDKkxUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH+w=7b7g-g7JmFvrgR4ezWz7CrVZnXVrV+u9iOitX0H0y_pVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKc7PVDQ-1Kh7EngkJSmB7buk0bEAkwsgZZVhLWW-fMaqnsdKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKc7PVDur7MUiaQrQ=Pm35W-8NEnSP5dvmxXY4V9s3rL9mojDg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 19:53:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKc7PVBynD-_TP8f3PCmcHDSJCbEwSDZj1vq5aNtU6Og3x0R5A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How can Zle -U interfere with zsh-syntax-highlighting?
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Seq: zsh-workers 38512

On 15 May 2016 at 17:41, Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15 May 2016 at 17:24, Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Luckily, I need LBUFFER+= only in the one tool that works.
>
> To early success call. Suspecting some degree of randomness in this, I
> did test on FreeBSD box and LBUFFER+= doesn't trigger highlighting
> there also in my first tool n-history. :/ Any thoughts where the
> slight cause of "highlight or not" can be located?

Turned out this depends on z-sy-h version. Starting from commit
487b122 doing LBUFFER+= triggers highlighting. Verified on FreeBSD,
Ubuntu, Arch Linux, OS X. However one RHEL/Fedora user still reports
that highlighting isn't triggered.

Best regards,
Sebastian Gniazdowski