Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject
         :mime-version;
        bh=Meh9SBErNPYhVzfzzxfHf57CKIzXnEqcCvxgkVAVbTs=;
        b=H+eZl0yyEN+9uAmE2jVweDtjyaVTA1RK6xqic7anUPN4r38PvPpXHXWYBDETlzjsyV
         +jIoeugLmLH6e5JOqyElmzfd4+yU6Pv+DNS97izQGvHfWZsMySQ6eL4pwaetBITXP2G1
         2rqDsSkEZoIODhpz+LcRufURX0eqmr0mKCL4y2WBF55PBwlXK6op1QstjLcxRtCY2zO1
         /QRtsKYYNGqYlmfJYt2rHBazaOWKFXSgbJDUhQ4Dk7sSuNgG0D22sA9tBT1q2epgboer
         FeCcjeNpD6tIAf39jpYwiPKvhBVIUgMfLvwPm/DHZy366EEUCc5wa8gWG9SgAeYvd6ai
         k3Gw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:to:subject:mime-version;
        bh=Meh9SBErNPYhVzfzzxfHf57CKIzXnEqcCvxgkVAVbTs=;
        b=g+daPbGNuYr1qUhMAHpYw0/cUrL+JfYq36kEIwAWoDhwMkGIIRaEYX7xU4uKglZXhY
         Ue1WNB4lVc7weLhry+qC3vlMl2cEyQh3YcwX8FJXeXjW+Xu2QW6/jNxpt54Cze5/pikn
         RErDXRSiPqcutUALtFpZzidGhCFRjqDkhc6cZF4viCt2j8WvBKc5SfpFmY48XPK2AH/X
         qLuSbfr1BfjQkh26+r4rBq8QSKlXV/aVxfoaERsU4EbsZ2Dtb3flrlJgFDNUTZlUi1aL
         Vc3AQMRsigsem4ozlSu7xIalVIWVzEvhTnyB7R6jJvzQNyT7gl+ssr189eBAAtfgw2ZH
         R8dA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKEJvJldleRHkI6gDT8ZBHJvladgYomrtRd2cm2uwLu7iAgq1CPd/6D/g9ZrwXSaw==
X-Received: by 10.98.4.195 with SMTP id 186mr8956329pfe.98.1464829517537;
        Wed, 01 Jun 2016 18:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <160601180514.ZM13286@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 18:05:14 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CACeGjnXfvr0ktY40iODXXFDmyokXbwVXJOkKVeA-xZSpeCrCfw@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In reply to Vin Shelton <ethersoft@gmail.com>
        "Re: new zsh build hang on sparkylinux (essentially debian test)" (May 13, 11:20pm)
References: <CACeGjnU0XO7B1H5tpAPCyYbdLQPUvb6tfWZYOrKw+mx6n0NXeg@mail.gmail.com> 
	<CAH+w=7axhqSkWSnOZoAYcPc70MuRwV6p=6h6zt_DZ9bC0YboXg@mail.gmail.com> 
	<CACeGjnXfvr0ktY40iODXXFDmyokXbwVXJOkKVeA-xZSpeCrCfw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: new zsh build hang on sparkylinux (essentially debian test)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Seq: zsh-workers 38566

Belated reply here, I've been traveling ... question directed at -workers,
not at Vin:

On May 13, 11:20pm, Vin Shelton wrote:
}
} Just for the record, this actually ended up being something to do with the
} compiler optimization settings.  Building with CFLAGS=-O yielded a working
} zsh.

Does our "configure" assure that the test cases are run with the same
compiler optimization flags as the final build?

Obviously compiler optimization isn't intended to change semantics, but
there may be some behavior that differs among standards and we're relying
on some variant that occurs when the build is not optimized.