Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:in-reply-to
         :comments:to:subject:mime-version;
        bh=QXurr6U87vXws3WuH//ZheO2s/hGE+x/WtSTYAOgESQ=;
        b=WtXX/4FPzRUMbdsdf6OKqb8FXlHmhXypmPSqZEvd6VAvRDrCJ8HB7dmPHl2yzQqQHU
         lemJJwqHJczImkDNMAeAFIIuVaWLNFu6Nud8it+0Pv1izzEYuBrVEiDzvbgD2o5ktoij
         d60RiMqaVW1inMUmm4QmLqV/O7r+MECCiFnQ9tP64Okg1InYBIlzOMW3cieBftWXk8jW
         yNVdefFLViy2hkQjohww4TEb2AI/njheswhQxe1DOHS6j9toME7eDWlPwv/4UVQujgAi
         irqZ/FTEdP9eKQ07w+iWdG+y25kAKapzRIh6/ghVhjFNJ+zU1a6are1NHeigoN2Z7HY5
         lfeQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:in-reply-to:comments:to:subject:mime-version;
        bh=QXurr6U87vXws3WuH//ZheO2s/hGE+x/WtSTYAOgESQ=;
        b=d/73dtxjM/LscVXzu3gLv4s4JVxOgW0kslgVE9bB9Mrsw0dpRXjsA0Ygehd5HXgJHV
         2cUbL/FxnMP6KmgQMMqsyuDkVMZm8GRu3Qby/cd9n3CgQbe6/vyghKVyHXIM8bYwuAFW
         V2+2MP8H3+UesheUay8JwbCNM7d5mqX02fPQUHltosIplYoMSGTAEH0V3AO9EjzDenlt
         YlNA/mjUsfVpk/gs5tV/ioAB39wNi1wJ0pDsAcAFc57+Bml9w5TB6Oj9WqQMJJAaRUAH
         b7MdBpvKG2vYyrXw2hCTtWcScuOZJpsuu1Rfdkgk+7jaiWI8GET0BkGh58gf6L95WGHy
         6RkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ2a3ntjx47cP16APU6xXy3r9ikQIFB2SmXosdFpTMYME/rDj415RvU5RZj4i2nJw==
X-Received: by 10.98.53.6 with SMTP id c6mr22299373pfa.47.1466436177401;
        Mon, 20 Jun 2016 08:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <160620082328.ZM4639@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 08:23:28 -0700
In-Reply-To: <15696.1466432007@thecus.kiddle.eu>
Comments: In reply to Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
        "Re: PATCH: allow default match specs to be disabled (was Re: [PATCH v4] zsh localedef completion)" (Jun 20,  4:13pm)
References: <57504DEC.9000101@redhat.com> 
	<2aa4c678-6d5e-0614-7aff-e374c3108ba3@gmx.com> 
	<5312.1465896712@thecus.kiddle.eu> 
	<fc6b9fc8-e37f-1756-ed08-c87d5ffd7317@gmx.com> 
	<23451.1466284625@thecus.kiddle.eu> 
	<160619091803.ZM1176@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<15696.1466432007@thecus.kiddle.eu> 
	<20160620161033.4fac0205@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-Reply-To: <20160620161033.4fac0205@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
        "Re: PATCH: allow default match specs to be disabled (was Re: [PATCH v4] zsh localedef completion)" (Jun 20,  4:10pm)
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: allow default match specs to be disabled (was Re: [PATCH v4] zsh localedef completion)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Seq: zsh-workers 38723

On Jun 20,  4:13pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
}
} A single hyphen wouldn't be a good idea because _wanted and similar
} helpers look for a single hyphen to indicate where they should insert
} the explanation options. The way ! is used in tag-order is somewhat
} different. Do you have a preference for it as such?

I do not have a preference.

} Yes, my question concerned only the order of match specifications as they
} are passed to compadd -M within a single string.

Ah!  OK, in that case the answer is that the order does not matter; all
the controls in a single string are supposed to apply "at the same time"
describing a single matching operation.

I'm quite surprised the doc doesn't come right out and say this anywhere, 
but the examples referring to "both left and right anchor" etc. make it
reasonably plain.

On Jun 20,  4:10pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} I think this is well into undocumented behaviour that a user might be
} well advised not to find out about by creating specs where it matters.

I can't think of any way to create a spec where it would matter ...

