Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(210.118.77.13):SA:0(-0.5/5.0):. Processed in 0.143002 secs); 09 Aug 2016 08:50:26 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: p.stephenson@samsung.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at samsung.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f796c6d000001486-5a-57a996f030fd Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 09:40:13 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [bug] shwordsplit not working on $@ when $# > 1 Message-id: <20160809094013.01f0f5f8@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <160808182124.ZM9355@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <20160808111626.GA19766@chaz.gmail.com> <20160808192734.21923640@ntlworld.com> <160808182124.ZM9355@torch.brasslantern.com> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xK7ofpq0MN+g/pGBxsPkhkwOjx6qD H5gCGKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4Mn6tf8dasJq9YsKt70wNjM9Zuxg5OSQETCQmbGtggrDFJC7c W8/WxcjFISSwlFFixfTT7BDODCaJQw9/gHUICZxmlDi9WQEicYZRonHacTaQBIuAqsSpqU3M IDabgKHE1E2zGUFsEQFxibNrz7OA2MICNhJd5+aBxXkF7CUW7uoE2sDBwSlgKfFzCjPE/G5G iVXXS0FsfgF9iat/P0FdZy8x88oZqFZBiR+T74GNZBbQkti8rYkVwpaX2LzmLdQcdYkbd3ez T2AUnoWkZRaSlllIWhYwMq9iFE0tTS4oTkrPNdQrTswtLs1L10vOz93ECAnmLzsYFx+zOsQo wMGoxMN7YfmKcCHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoivM8mrgwX4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIkzjt3 1/sQIYH0xJLU7NTUgtQimCwTB6dUA+NEwaTtFvM+J65fdGxl4ZKIlt7/v/z3VFwKSPBWjzi9 4kPVxcaPi1deD9b3i3/4+pfPWgOPu4qqnl1CyvLaOb3ru6tcxbd/uD1Hn4dl/svUuQe6ilJy 2SYpbXA8Yyj+6lfwx4w30++V2W3TdGV36vzTI/jmZWG1ZXIoX/UCrXWaj6Vlpi0780aJpTgj 0VCLuag4EQAO008WYgIAAA== X-Seq: zsh-workers 39011 On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 18:21:24 -0700 Bart Schaefer wrote: > I *think* we can untangle this as follows, but then again I thought > I had untangled in in workers/29313, too. This relies on the idea > that if we already have an array when nojoin, then we're not going > to split it again, which seems dubious somehow if there is explicit > use of the (s:-:) flag. That was my first worry, looking at the change, but simple examples of this still work, so I can't see an obvious case where this isn't better than before. > Existing tests still pass, but then they always did, this needs a > new one. Holding off until we think of other edge cases. I suppose adding tests is key to this. There are already a number involving (s...), however. Perhaps we need some more with both joining and splitting on various types of object (and then work out what the result actually should be...) pws