Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Amusing (?) behavior of zsh/parameter specials

X-seq: zsh-workers 37791
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Amusing (?) behavior of zsh/parameter specials
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:58:42 +0000
In-reply-to: <160125211140.ZM15762@torch.brasslantern.com>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
References: <160123090736.ZM14384@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160124182611.710b0fba@ntlworld.com> <160125211140.ZM15762@torch.brasslantern.com>

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 21:11:40 -0800
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The main problem with the latter one is that, if the parameter really
> is read-only after autoloading, "restoring" the unset will fail.  I
> guess the point is to restore the parameters that ARE set, so now that
> I've written this all down I lean even more to the first variant.

Yes, that was my attitude in previous changes for typeset -p.

pws

References:
- Amusing (?) behavior of zsh/parameter specials
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: Amusing (?) behavior of zsh/parameter specials
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: Amusing (?) behavior of zsh/parameter specials
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author