Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Speaking of 5.8.1.3-test ...

X-seq: zsh-workers 50197
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Jun T <takimoto-j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Speaking of 5.8.1.3-test ...
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 09:41:05 -0700
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/50197>
In-reply-to: <83D915BA-288A-4A60-AA32-964B78861D0E@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <CAH+w=7Z+EmB0Bg2rUdOtktkx-rQHFSu-+2CbeYdC20rYZ-Xq8Q@mail.gmail.com> <83D915BA-288A-4A60-AA32-964B78861D0E@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>

On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 9:08 PM Jun T <takimoto-j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So just calling setuid(getuid()) is enough for dropping the privilege.
>
> A simple workaround would be the following.
> Or we can define BROKEN_SETRE{U,G}ID in configure.ac if $host_os is netbsd.

I'd vote for the simpler approach (your included diff) given proximity
to release.  Perhaps we can come up with a better configure.ac test
later.

References:
- Speaking of 5.8.1.3-test ...
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: Speaking of 5.8.1.3-test ...
  - From: Jun T

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author