Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Consolidated nofork substitution changes
- X-seq: zsh-workers 52177
- From: "Jun. T" <takimoto-j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Consolidated nofork substitution changes
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:41:03 +0900
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/52177>
- In-reply-to: <CAH+w=7Y3VfxuZDfSF4O05nxLFRVyvoCBBZnW0dePGBQhKe2LbA@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- References: <CAH+w=7avr_BmzxBSbjdhvtpngU3xaKV0yKBBge9nMOHjkGtgGg@mail.gmail.com> <EFF69F26-15E6-4B5B-8D81-C679DC51AFF3@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <071C3F0A-AE0B-4040-88FA-9E841981EDB1@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <CAH+w=7Y3VfxuZDfSF4O05nxLFRVyvoCBBZnW0dePGBQhKe2LbA@mail.gmail.com>
> 2023/09/23 9:25, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think this.
The patch is somewhat mis-formatted?
(it can be easily applied manually).
So ztuff() is no longer necessary?
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author