Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: The spelling of shell options in intro.ms (Introduction to Zsh)

X-seq: zsh-workers 53900
From: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: The spelling of shell options in intro.ms (Introduction to Zsh)
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 17:21:02 +0100 (BST)
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/53900>
Feedback-id: 20250829-p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx:oxsmtp-prd-nl-vmo:Authrelay:p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <bc02df20-3258-42f1-be92-231bd44981aa@zentaur.org>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <bc02df20-3258-42f1-be92-231bd44981aa@zentaur.org>

> On 29/08/2025 16:20 BST Clinton Bunch <cdb_zsh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm working on converting this document to reStructuredText (rst) and 
> I've noticed the document uses the (canonical?) form of squishing the 
> option words together making them hard to read, how does the group feel 
> about converting them to the optional underscore-separated version?

Sounds good to me --- I suspect that document hasn't been touched in
more than thirty years.  It probably could do with more work but basic
rationalisation is a good start.

cheers
pws

References:
- The spelling of shell options in intro.ms (Introduction to Zsh)
  - From: Clinton Bunch

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author