Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

RE: The spelling of shell options in intro.ms (Introduction to Zsh)

X-seq: zsh-workers 54133
From: zeurkous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: Clinton Bunch <cdb_zsh@xxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: The spelling of shell options in intro.ms (Introduction to Zsh)
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2025 13:42:29 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/54133>
In-reply-to: <bc02df20-3258-42f1-be92-231bd44981aa@zentaur.org>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <bc02df20-3258-42f1-be92-231bd44981aa@zentaur.org>

On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 10:20:47 -0500, Clinton Bunch <cdb_zsh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm working on converting this document to reStructuredText (rst)

As you might've guessed, me's less-than-enthusiastic about this
endeavour, but...

> and 
> I've noticed the document uses the (canonical?) form of squishing the 
> option words together making them hard to read, how does the group feel 
> about converting them to the optional underscore-separated version?

...that bit does make sense and such a patch for Doc/intro.ms would here
be appreciated.

        --zeurkous.

-- 
Friggin' Machines!

References:
- The spelling of shell options in intro.ms (Introduction to Zsh)
  - From: Clinton Bunch

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author