Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: commits for possible 5.9.1
- X-seq: zsh-workers 54414
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: commits for possible 5.9.1
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:46:21 -0700
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.google.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Y+NKlCTNmI8B91CNX9FP+oip7Mztdex+EFzt8hW2eqg=; fh=ix+gOCxUsthuAyWVItadPpLoTdq2rxSRGKkBEuqevUQ=; b=QckUoNY909f8smwjxfcfHW0cLcQQT7r54kUXIy5Wzn4rP9fi8iMyYikf0YSK30e4YL i7IPz6EVuXsXNMM5nno3XmveQ+rOUoxlbqiflZcnm75pCikkxwPwBHvhlx8RiACRzT75 wTYvO9JFZ5rtuwB/aQrSbIleoMB0G7XKuWgty3qEP/5knP/yH6FjnHpzPWO/AszYwMR1 ggd5wSt5u/IZN/72HsOqPMEXYESudrMHOetu/P3sWhHQkE974N9TvrYw3H0DnttW0jyj b0++tkXnpJYuD4Vo+ur8vEhrSNDZPgIIQ/6S2tfaLR80HLcVhxmwCVElUbX/CEMbT1AT gAfg==; darn=zsh.org
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1777477593; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; b=HkoGRKxMOyOKAsGhojTNi5EIZ0WU3DoUBYrNhcHqG1UUd38Vwgc7cRBDGtEiyYdtZT 0oQnDpw7vImJrIvLaiFaG6vdGVzeKENTp558b3wdyvGaXdi+7Yd11d6Y7rjhPF4ofAmp T26knQyEkEZPIBa8n248j/0kUAnCEN8gDZ0ab5E83SmEiI52Y3Kp3auW0DVk3DxDSfRg yOYBsAT1/dDxwiIecDn/Cds7OMXQIOa7OfcIrxxK6EVtCZIW86zOcw//RtkeRT5ObmE6 D635bn8jEkdHYgh+etX4U7/a3WjZB5DzwIr1NOfWf9k2QTyuY3tf5ocE8CvpG36kiL5L Hgkg==
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/54414>
- In-reply-to: <604806619.58311.1777476342166@mail.virginmedia.com>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- References: <74ce1b88-57b2-4a2e-bf34-dcfe797a934a@app.fastmail.com> <1085353672.395911.1777278621161@mail.virginmedia.com> <CAGdYchtkMv5Py-YpLxeXeobYABWBH8=LzEF66O8xsqDJ2PJ_kQ@mail.gmail.com> <604806619.58311.1777476342166@mail.virginmedia.com>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 8:25 AM Peter Stephenson
<p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Speaking from an overall co-ordination point of view, rather than
> attempting to judge the detailed technical merit, I'm actually happy to
> see this go in, as long as you and Bart are reasonably happy
If the point of this discussion is to create a relatively stable
5.9.1, then namerefs are not a good candidate.
> [...] that would mean we can go straight to a
> full release, which saves a lot of legwork.
In that case I (or someone) would need to finish applying the five (?)
patches Philippe has already produced, and we should just go right
ahead to 5.10 and not call it 5.9.1.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author