Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH] compinit forks less
- X-seq: zsh-workers 54434
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] compinit forks less
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:51:57 -0700
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.google.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=1cc91U/HG4iy1Of3N3e9+xgzEY8At9LRR9TJlSE0b/Q=; fh=SbTlPuNNxBzTkRlwWtqw/TXBY0HvGvtE97RpPp3sJPM=; b=Ju8xWBEH2tEn3TA0CnWTaIusYxN2zCUFchemOin2X9TrYYeupmTvC3d5BxcCfmjqhh Xk/O/BfqOVUK4x6Q/eRY5L8HzlhqNMeU+RQizuhDHRG4d8Tbes519XEvFMpWuwBNYzNm RNSRnhrnsFEOBUIHCZbohihVwfIYwWEKLchhFZDVriiJAFCGUKT8sqCCKg69MUCzi1a2 OlgADTuej/Dz3WUJEQAuOuJSjOjbfir1c9wl7hJi50LPvRjjTrCiT2dvKhaw3to4aUzD Hz6we9RYvv9eCkYEdbiFMrRrPdrVrksvXINml2/RSFMyXFQwt/byA3YoLR7N2GKdMekm Tgbg==; darn=zsh.org
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1777589530; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; b=a9RcRGCKfxf+wqbuXijX+89wSL4BqXmst3IH0GJt4ZOIrMLATKxDUssMUqpPxpJ3hh YHxATD4T8V9rB5m5u11bT/4jQTZHd4eFP+2dc68lM3QDZdnxlVuei8ESrsYVUOlE4HAG O1u/uOFh4v6kj5/i6Ir2f8YjgS0dpN9RjFFD4rDqFcIUn/gc2nBMoJV0G0swlScc3spP Ycj45Yscc9VGXBcs9VLxc2uMl+l6vIvxx+eirSqkCmdDvkBSkD6pOmRqbNOskFlMainV B43dqeAxZ3Vs3dC1Tcp2LjeJwc1tacoT/Eyw5FaBQ5RdqpnzyYrvCYE+aQlqCA9Nnqik 0y1g==
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/54434>
- In-reply-to: <CAH+w=7aTJV-QcBtmWy=9_AmL=e21rKqn3n35qo6daXb+dk1N8w@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- References: <CAKiz1a_X09-MpXhOwtD2H4tykBi9HTkLq52Xirc25WHXsmjn4w@mail.gmail.com> <da9600c7-48e6-44b7-91ba-57265e4e76b8@app.fastmail.com> <CAKiz1a9_6YTDSXX+Pkfqyn+hkgLMB-M4U3i07HnYkDj_wo1gEQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7aTJV-QcBtmWy=9_AmL=e21rKqn3n35qo6daXb+dk1N8w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 3:37 PM Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> All that said, there's a different way to go about it, see attached. Question, should rplyoutfd here be entered into fdtable somehow? It is not for here-strings.
I'm not necessarily advocating for the "nofork_safety" patch unless
it's thought that there really is a problem with the temp file usage.
Also, I realized after sending that rplyoutfd should be closed sooner,
so a couple of more tweaks would be needed.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author