Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH] remove obsolete functions
- X-seq: zsh-workers 54877
- From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: dana <dana@xxxxxxx>
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove obsolete functions
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:28:57 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.google.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20260327; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=WIJaTj2sWxuCygrDqbQpmHu+ixD+z1D6sotKgiVhCU8=; fh=WfGsDpWeTF+M2TVUmApBV2qNabodhC7pOL4lqg2Qg6M=; b=sCOwqoH1Yrj3M9CGsT8b46npf8Lu7EOmVkrM1vs5HE+UbO75sde5+KXNEIm09+ZV5z f7zXUPkR7/GT3JDchwKsJrOBcg648zLD6jS554oYIjpXsNImTC2ZMpk1jL7CP40taBBy kBNMPB+tXasoqWtPmLmRt6buRPnJjZFssymBm+H2yqTFEz2LCaOdHVNwG0iPcGJGPOQ2 xd67yO3sfSWc6byv+L+pXcP6deZFZvUYKTz1tmVLJ00e/sbEHxlnIoyEWDqnbIT+N/HV 72Go2D+qaAZGbvMOmmZZvYSIIa55rvjplh5GOeWA1PX8fS6OdtKPtHi9uM91xB0v1y7P UrHQ==; darn=zsh.org
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1782804550; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20260327; b=YPkqaA5ftnbAPa80riLIsAyRfyGpmrjfNLtnb6cEuWQJcAUOzPvCeDd524ZXaCjl2d WDdcrPxXg1XVt6ozpYoU+cfFnReMmTlDPF4G/TiAMvUHR67Uh62IBze8y/mcsQklBwJe ZDD7XaA765bgwcbyODiRfxMKJH1Cda94nhYKowyo9fiD+2Sx/JD+gN8dOHFktokkzRn0 3s+g+pXKF+8sgwemse4HxEIv8c/Il83Weu4wA5lC9MoafI7I51xCHb4rn6JR+19hpmEQ lfEu6cDdxS1myn0eOWYkhZ+ivdVJ3N5m3hT5sXOJ/9VsqQ//TgrtQx3OuLKIXi6m+Wao rnag==
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/54877>
- In-reply-to: <60f7bdfd-3d4c-40d3-b6ee-72ce2911ad9b@app.fastmail.com>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- References: <60f7bdfd-3d4c-40d3-b6ee-72ce2911ad9b@app.fastmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 5:14 AM dana <dana@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> are there any objections to getting rid of these?
>
> (note that the last modification date is often deceptive, usually it's
> just bulk localising variables or something)
>
> - _gqview -- tool abandoned in 2006
This one's called geeqie these days (I think it's technically a fork,
but it takes the same options).
Someone on irc complained the other day that todo <tab> printed weird
errors, and I checked the site[1] in the header of _devtodo, and it
appears the 'version 1' called just todo has been long superseded,
their current tool binary seems to be todo2. Either way, it's pretty
likely that people make local scripts/functions named todo so it's
probably a good idea to remove that too.
[1] http://swapoff.org/DevTodo
--
Mikael Magnusson
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author