Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2

X-seq: zsh-users 342
From: "Timothy J. Luoma" <luomat@xxxxxxxx>
To: schaefer@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 96 07:48:31 -0400
Cc: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <960804235458.ZM10347@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Princeton Theological Seminary
References: <199608050112.VAA22841@xxxxxxxx> <960804235458.ZM10347@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: luomat@xxxxxxxx

"Bart Schaefer" on Sun, 4 Aug 1996 wrote:
> Did you compile with debugging and zsh_mem and so forth? 

No, just regular ./configure

> To what previous version are you comparing it (so we know what
> changes to re-examine)?

2.6-beta13 is what I've been using, but I've got 3.0-pre2 here too and that did not display this beahvior.

Would you need/like to see the compiling output?

Thanks for the help, I love zsh but it really is too slow to be usable...

TjL

Follow-Ups:
- Re: zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2
  - From: Charles Swiger

References:
- zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2
  - From: Timothy J. Luoma
- Re: zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author