Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Re: Git completion - contributing to git.git
- X-seq: zsh-users 15143
- From: Doug Kearns <dougkearns@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Git completion - contributing to git.git
- Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 15:50:09 +1000
- Cc: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lVStTQKZcUM1oEBlz0FU9R49OAdOMhm/2SDjeUK4/6U=; b=cd2nZTOVpCWJAFDWkUeEbxfYX85Kh5BiYn6LHCfunJjLeZgm6FkKdKDjpIZOuvw5eT 8ISPpXGGoP+jSlxtf335gi2Vwb5TZR27cxZ6Vey57a0+wfeiRr9JE0i1wc4W7dORRIOp y2abLmQ4KvbGNWtuApyDTsiDL+5KsCLClqnN0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fb9blK8Ygr4wlMTdjBWNBYcGdWN+vv/+nFYtW67b1le6dQoyjJgvuxLBOJbIW+jgeO GImYI/zqXWI3a4D2UWImkXh4szmJqxHEqGge3Ccy/yIQ2aewDWba7b45YwrLMopt1SiJ 6rLiD0eapB541TbU9vGM3474dLifm8WXWf9uY=
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTik6Ys8mRgMj8yz0Iyo5bUIXyqQFtZFqRFyXAF42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20100701010506.GC13062@vidovic> <AANLkTik6Ys8mRgMj8yz0Iyo5bUIXyqQFtZFqRFyXAF42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 03:05, Nicolas Sebrecht
> <nicolas.s-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (Why am I not included in the Cc? I am the original and principal
> author, after all. The minuscule amount of attribution it would have
> provided would have been nice. ;-)
We know who wrote it. I'm scared to touch it lest you yell at me.
>> What about starting contributing to Git ('contrib/completion' looks like
>> a good path) ? Could Git completion contributors send their patches to
>> the Git project too ?
> I’d rather not, to be honest. It’s always a pain to have two files,
> as they can become out of sync when patches are sent to one repository
> and not the other, users don’t know which version to use, and so on.
There's nothing special about Git either. What of the other 500 odd
completion functions and 'associated' projects?
Messages sorted by: