Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Re: `cd .` in non-existent directory leads into weird corner case
- X-seq: zsh-users 16968
- From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: `cd .` in non-existent directory leads into weird corner case
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:16:37 +0200
- Cc: zsh-users@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=I1lABssKSYl3u4aHj2Uk/otsDZKe4kDkfwNLjvhoO4Q=; b=MedZ/Gk/7FKDFRoxuzcUGHPw9P10oq1kOpzHEwCj6s+Nrz2p6RENJBJIqaL5+wn/PI uB4JS0TOw/r+pNEYJs4aiBlwx1PEMytDrsmeBpOrcq+qVhDfjymbniGnI2i1s3ibRa9q ydnZethPSpAAIfL9ay3IK/0QOAXI+vmmQEgCNsGkuY9mNndS5LHHarV6LNUseK0Hth7R Q/8Wr7mJBq0lpGi8EHTG9QKR/fEb5XpL00hvQgrI34Zo2kx8JxS9Bri0pjOtVyZFf3Ye oyBLaRrJDNpb8tadGISchHO8ebkFAz2BD0czC7eSq72RV+T7EBwB18gYE6xJ218Ujino dMgg==
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <CAD77+gT4LXRyTL8V1UZrNfCohyJ9peTNdfZ=G7Q-sJcDnyNE8Q@mail.gmail.com> <120327073414.ZM6783@torch.brasslantern.com> <CAD77+gSn9zrTHDMj=zi_Y5M6b86pOizkUin8zVVEAU1aTfuKfw@mail.gmail.com> <email@example.com> <CAHYJk3QPQC-P8wbpMJDkxvdww-Lar3L+AoaHzM8rh_rO=Z=zYA@mail.gmail.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <CAHYJk3Rp-GkAAnmqdJNm0NshETSceZsbAUMBwBo=is60sm0KCw@mail.gmail.com> <email@example.com>
On 3 April 2012 11:57, Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:10:17 +0200
> Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> One (semi-)realistic case I came up with, one shell sits in a
>> directory, someone else first moves the directory, then deletes it,
>> then the shell tries to 'cd ..'. In this case I would like it to end
>> up in the new parent directory as it does now , not the old
>> "$PWD:h". (with chasedots/-P) (and even if I did 'cd .' first for some
>> weird reason).
> Hmmm... when I read this before I concentrated on "as it does now" and
> skipped the "not the old $PWD:h". I don't see how that can work.
> You're saying we should use the physical directory to find its parent
> even though it doesn't exist any more.
> Are you saying you think the shell currently has some magic to do
> this? It seems to violate the laws of physics, unless we recorded
> the physical directory as a second PWD just on the off chance someone
> deletes the current one, which seems silly.
I don't know if this is something that works on all systems, but on
linux at least, it seems that the directory inode sticks around while
a process still has it, or any subdirectory of it, as its current
directory (or otherwise open i suppose). This means that it is still
possible to access the . and .. entries in it, and follow them via
chdir(), see the transcripts in my other mail where it even works from
a second shell going into the dir via 'cd /proc/$firstshell/cwd' and
then doing 'cd -P ..'.
If the system doesn't keep the '..' entry around, I'm not demanding
that cd -P .. should work as I described :).
Messages sorted by: