Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: A comment about "slurp" and -o multibyte

X-seq: zsh-users 29512
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Zsh Users <zsh-users@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A comment about "slurp" and -o multibyte
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:06:05 -0800
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/users/29512>
In-reply-to: <CAN=4vMrAKoZ-R7kaCpESkEU4PuBM-8Yxig1d1Jg7QLqNK7jMNw@mail.gmail.com>
List-id: <zsh-users.zsh.org>
References: <CAH+w=7YpEjmzROcrOsqwJ+EMsa7dQUMFQKJoY7YqFC1VpBGtzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN=4vMrAKoZ-R7kaCpESkEU4PuBM-8Yxig1d1Jg7QLqNK7jMNw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:08 PM Roman Perepelitsa
<roman.perepelitsa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> To me this behavior looks as expected. It's consistent with `read`,
> `sysread` and process substitution.

It's consistent and as expected from the implementation, yes, but it
might not be what a user expects without careful consideration.

References:
- A comment about "slurp" and -o multibyte
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: A comment about "slurp" and -o multibyte
  - From: Roman Perepelitsa

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author