Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Sigh. Wouldn't consistency be nice?

X-seq: zsh-workers 1479
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (ZSH Workers Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Sigh. Wouldn't consistency be nice?
Date: 29 Jun 1996 19:53:01 +0200
In-reply-to: Zefram's message of Sat, 29 Jun 1996 17:41:07 +0100 (BST)
References: <2092.199606291641@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: hniksic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Zefram (A.Main@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> (Yes, consistency would be nice.  And I'm surprised that bash, being a
> GNU program, didn't produce the same answer as zsh, which gets it from
> autoconf.)

This is because bash does not use autoconf, having its own
autoconfiguration facilities. The bash FAQ states that bash-2.0 will
probably support the GNU autoconf.

-- 
hniksic@xxxxxxx              |  Student of electrical engineering
hniksic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx        |  University of Zagreb, Croatia
------------------------------------------------------------------
The IDIOT.  Usually a cretin, morpohodite, or old COBOL programmer
selected to be the system administrator by a committee of cretins,
morphodites, and old COBOL programmers.

References:
- Re: Sigh. Wouldn't consistency be nice?
  - From: Zefram

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author