Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Treatment of illegal indices

X-seq: zsh-workers 3792
From: Andrew Main <zefram@xxxxxxxxx>
To: eggink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bernd Eggink)
Subject: Re: Treatment of illegal indices
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:11:51 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <34F42478.8174C710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Bernd Eggink" at Feb 25, 98 03:02:32 pm

Bernd Eggink wrote:
>Andrew Main wrote:
>> That's a deliberate feature.
>
>Huh? What's the sense in that??

No one has suggested anything better for it to do.  This behaviour
is consistent with the behaviour of foo[i,j]=bar for i<=j -- the new
element is immediately preceded by the old $foo[i-1], and followed by
the old $foo[j+1].

-zefram

References:
- Re: Treatment of illegal indices
  - From: Bernd Eggink

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author