Re: Final (?) info on signals/crashes when suspending "mutt" function

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Bart Schaefer" wrote:
> The failure in case (1) is far less catastrophic than case (2), so I think
> the right solution is to back off to the behavior from patch 6707 (that is,
> scrap 6819 and most of 6824, but 6848 and 6850 are orthogonal and good).

[except that 6850 isn't because the shell hangs when called from sh.]
Somebody who's been looking at this will have to produce counter-patches
for pws-24, I'm not going to attempt this myself on a wing and a prayer.

If we can
  1) handle shell structures with well-behaved external programmes
     (i.e. not sh, ksh, zcat)
  2) suspend and interrupt functions running well-behaved external
     programmes (or none)
  3) not hang because of failed attempts to set the pgrp
then I think we should declare a truce before 3.1.6.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>       Tel: +39 050 844536
WWW:  http://www.ifh.de/~pws/
Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy