Re: 3.1.6-test-1: configure --enable-static no longer means --disable-dynamic?

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Bart Schaefer" wrote:
> I was sure this worked at one time, but maybe it worked only because using
> --enable-dynamic was not the default.  In any event, either --enable-static
> should work, or the configure help should report --disable-dynamic rather
> than --enable-dynamic as an option, or both.

I don't remember an --enable-static, but configure accepts any --enable
options without complaint whether they are used or not, so provided you
didn't also give --enable-dynamic it would have had the desired effect
before the change -- but so would --enable-moon-made-of-green-cheese.

--- configure.in.dyn	Tue Jul 13 11:12:35 1999
+++ configure.in	Wed Jul 14 10:07:48 1999
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
 dnl Do you want large file support, if available?
 undefine([lfs])dnl
 AC_ARG_ENABLE(lfs,
-[  --enable-lfs               turn on support for large files],
+[  --disable-lfs              turn off support for large files],
 [lfs="$enableval"], [lfs=yes])
 
 dnl Pathnames for global zsh scripts
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
 dnl Do you want dynamically loaded binary modules.
 undefine([dynamic])dnl
 AC_ARG_ENABLE(dynamic,
-[  --enable-dynamic           allow dynamically loaded binary modules],
+[  --disable-dynamic          turn off dynamically loaded binary modules],
 [dynamic="$enableval"], [dynamic=yes])
 
 dnl Do you want to compile as K&R C.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>       Tel: +39 050 844536
WWW:  http://www.ifh.de/~pws/
Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy