Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: 3.1.6-dev-22

X-seq: zsh-workers 10697
From: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxx>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:59:15 +0100 (BST)
Cc: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <000411144233.ZM8932@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from Bart Schaefer at "Apr 11, 2000 02:42:33 pm"
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

Bart Schaefer wrote:
>> If you don't see a problem with changing the way zshpaths.h is made (and I
>> presume you tried it out) then I certainly don't.
>
>Zefram?  I believe it's your test I'm proposing to delete ... or maybe it's
>Zoltan's ...

It's really a policy decision: when should zshpaths.h be rebuilt.
I've previously expressed my point of view on that -- that zshpaths.h
should always be made consistent with the parameter values effective in
the make in progress -- but there is a perfectly reasonable alternative
of making zshpaths.h from the originally configured values.  I have no
problem with either scheme.

-zefram

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3.1.6-dev-22
  - From: Bart Schaefer

References:
- Re: 3.1.6-dev-22
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author