Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: new _print and thoughts on _arguments mutexes

X-seq: zsh-workers 10845
From: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxx>
To: Oliver Kiddle <opk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: new _print and thoughts on _arguments mutexes
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:58:09 +0100 (BST)
Cc: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <38FDD5C4.829DF9F@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> from Oliver Kiddle at "Apr 19, 2000 04:50:28 pm"
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

Oliver Kiddle wrote:
>That is useful. On the debian system here, there is a readlink(1). Is
>that common on Linux?

I don't see one on Red Hat.  But there's this really neat shell that has a
`stat' command...

>lrwx------    1 kiddleo  kiddleo        64 Apr 19 16:35 10 -> /dev/pts/0

Fantastic, isn't it.  I just saw this full-pathname behaviour for the
first time today; last time I had looked (2.0, I think) it just gave
device and inode numbers.

>lr-x------    1 kiddleo  kiddleo        64 Apr 19 16:35 11 -> pipe:[111653]
>
>Does anyone know what the significance of the 111654 and 111653 is.

Different from all other pipes?

>I convert them into anything useful like the PID of the coprocess. 

No way.

-zefram

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: new _print and thoughts on _arguments mutexes
  - From: Trond Eivind Glomsrød

References:
- Re: PATCH: new _print and thoughts on _arguments mutexes
  - From: Oliver Kiddle

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author