Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Bug in ${(z)...} lexing, or what?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 12236
 
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,        zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
 
- Subject: Re: Bug in ${(z)...} lexing, or what?
 
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:41:20 +0000
 
- In-reply-to: <0FXL002CJGG9E2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
 
- References: <0FXL002CJGG9E2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
On Jul 12,  5:57pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: Bug in ${(z)...} lexing, or what?
}
} That was before applying the patch (the correct behaviour).  After, I get:
} 
} [[
} a
} =
} (
} ;
} 
} with interactivecomments set (which is wrong), and what Sven was reporting
} without it (which isn't great).  I'd much prefer the old behaviour in this
} case, but the interactivecomments variant is definitely broken.
The situation is exactly reversed inside a ZLE widget:  The behavior with
both interactivecomments and without is now correct inside the widget, but
broken outside.
So was all Sven's patch acheived to invert some condition?
-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net   
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author