Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Re: PATCH: "User Contributions" manual, & misc.
- X-seq: zsh-workers 12747
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: "User Contributions" manual, & misc.
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 09:07:54 +0200 (MET DST)
- In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:56:38 +0000
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Sep 5, 10:34am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
> } - The indexes for the styles say `completion style' even for those
> } styles looked up with a non-:completion context. Sounds wrong,
> } doesn't it? If only I knew what to write instead...
> I almost changed the predict-on style index entries to read "predictive
> typing style" but that's too long to fit in the space info allots.
> Perhaps "widget style", since it's for a ZLE widget? (But there are
> completion widgets, too, so ...)
`utility style'? `misc.'?
> } - The place where the zsh/zpty module is mentioned (in info, at the
> } nslookup function) is messed up (by the automatic module-docs-stuff).
> Can you explain what's "messed up" in a bit more detail?
Uh oh. Does that mean that you don't get this:
nslookup [ ARG ... ]
This wrapper function for the nslookup command requires the
zsh/zpty +module. It behaves exactly like the standard nslookup
except that it provides customizable prompts (including a
The `+' before `module'. That first appeared when Zefram added the
doc-part of the hierarchical-module-name stuff, I think. I complained
at that time (and hence I think it may look like this in other places,
too). Or is my zsh version here messed up, somehow, and noone else
> (I didn't put
> a cross-reference in there; perhaps that's what you think went wrong?)
I was thinking about doing that myself and then found out that I'm too
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by: