64-bit sparc instructions

["Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On May 22,  8:04pm, Paul Ackersviller wrote:
} 
} [...] What does make a difference is simply generating default 32-bit
} sparc instructions.  I'd negelected to mention that I was using Sun's
} compiler and 64-bit code.  I suppose it's fair to blame this one on Sun.

Is that problem solved by the following?

On May 22,  2:32pm, Clint Adams wrote:
} Subject: Re: 4.0.1-pre-5 (solaris issues)
}
} > the 64-bit Forte compiler.  Can you figure out what we need to be passing
} > as a compiler argument that we aren't, or whatever?
}
} LFS64_CFLAGS:                   -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
} LFS_CFLAGS:                     -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
}
} By replacing the latter with the former, the test [succeeds].

If so, can you identify a configure test we can use to decide when to
use LFS64_CFLAGS instead of LFS_CFLAGS ?  (The existing test is in the
definition of zsh_LARGE_FILE_SUPPORT in aczsh.m4.)

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net