Re: Patch/integration policy

["Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jun 6, 11:07am, Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
}
} Now with forked CVS we have to decide
} 
} Posting - should patches be posted for both stable and development?

Patches should be posted for the development branch only, IMO.  It's not
a problem to post both as long as they're labeled appropriately, but the
development version is called that for a reason ...

} Integration - are patch authors responsible for applying them to both
} branches? Or we designate some person(s) who will maintain stable
} version and integrate patches fron HEAD while other will continue in
} HEAD as before?

The second of those would be preferable, I think, though there's no way
we can actually prevent anyone who has commit access from doing the first.

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net