Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: subversion and programmable completion

X-seq: zsh-workers 18879
From: kfogel@xxxxxxxxxx
To: Clint Adams <clint@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: subversion and programmable completion
Date: 21 Jul 2003 10:15:17 -0500
Cc: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Emacs: the answer to the world surplus of CPU cycles.
In-reply-to: <20030720162723.GA26506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20030720162723.GA26506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: kfogel@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: kfogel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Clint Adams <clint@xxxxxxx> writes:
> The zsh completion function for subversion currently parses the output
> of svn help <subcommand>, attempting to complete based on the contents
> of the usage: and Valid options: sections.
> 
> How does the subversion team feel about providing this and additional
> information in a more-machine-parseable format?  I imagine that that
> would lead to the bash completion becoming more intelligent as well.

What's not machine parseable about the current output?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: subversion and programmable completion
  - From: Clint Adams

References:
- subversion and programmable completion
  - From: Clint Adams

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author