Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: sourcing a sh file in zsh

X-seq: zsh-workers 26503
From: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: sourcing a sh file in zsh
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:23:51 +0000
In-reply-to: Message from Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> of "Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:39:52 PST." <090131133952.ZM7971@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

Bart Schaefer wrote:
> If *every* function defined in the sourced file gets an implicit
> LOCAL_OPTIONS by virtue of emulation stickyness

I suppose this is the bone of contention.  I just argued that you only
get the effect of LOCAL_OPTIONS for a function if you weren't already in
that sticky emulation when the function started---which is probably more
useful, I think, giving you a more consistent emulation environment, but
also needs a little more care.  (Nobody is arguing we don't need care, I
realise...)

-- 
Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web page now at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/p.w.stephenson/

References:
- Re: sourcing a sh file in zsh
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author