Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH] Updates to git completion
- X-seq: zsh-workers 26507
- From: Allan Caffee <allan.caffee@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zsh Workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updates to git completion
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:48:58 -0500
- Cc: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingmar Vanhassel <ingmar@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Nikolai Weibull <now@xxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=X22uv3mBJ2OcJOXrLA+N9Wgfe0Jd3KZcBctJ7AQ7JzM=; b=QuQ7sgSeKbDFoIh3NW4OQVX3/1si9s8nP/aPchMcPlCPuflBwb9KpYF7qMtIN2Oz7E k0eP3yL0HYrchMVa57ieWZUrQAcidJPdo/J3zyCdCLIMznH+WcnnYomjEOF2fCzUv2w5 N+p3o7PyaOX5Ae7Fa96A+yfHCr5WH3mkmKmSs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bJu/J7lXXL6AjgdWM0JLhMJ9YV0LmHfe3XR9yHNelusdsAISpbWKcCLZiEG30ZJ5fj Vmwy41Ym2GkxGOcNVIZhbPpcAmAc0ZlhninBBbwAjklETzQG/TD1/pQreSsOzCTpVoCC COfg8N5FBQ5VPcJlfg/7pOptZ44MbL2ZL5+/k=
- In-reply-to: <dbfc82860901290718l27b7800eh551cfd2fcf2a5309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <1233231710-1204-1-git-send-email-ingmar@xxxxxxxxxxx> <2d460de70901290636g6e0b43fw971397716cba8886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <237967ef0901290640u9adf073g204586c1b290d0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2d460de70901290707m13032c77l782a8ca30ce09486@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbfc82860901290718l27b7800eh551cfd2fcf2a5309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Nikolai Weibull <now@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yeah, that's way to complicated and adds even more complexity to an
> already complex code-base (I should know, I wrote the initial commit).
> One could follow upstream commits, but I found it easier to simply go
> through the manual pages after each new (major) revision, adding new
> options and removing old ones.
This raises the question of why zsh is maintaining the completion for
git at all. It would be simpler to match behavior with git's current
version if they were tracked together. And git already tracks the
bash completion. Thoughts?
-Allan
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author