Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
When can we make a compromise in Git completion?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 29158
- From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Nikolai Weibull <now@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: When can we make a compromise in Git completion?
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 01:07:39 +0300
- Cc: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iuo6Hf1HgdgUxPbtEGyvt612duU4B+ul/QTgjw+ETpI=; b=pcBSG+X6Q5rzc1qxVJS/iSGY5ZzYl6BoPiVpX4lH+/aOpuNzUyUGXyRv2pG8al98Bw pclea27f+Xci9Qj+OOxbnfRR8bE9YDlLm3kHBArFPY+mmaahMF0qhzxjX43eyH3hPLyb QkjeO7FfCqgR+Mqql9C2eezQnAQ+CRGAX1x5M=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=s8vpc3jkftiPoO6ClBUU4kAIm6roH8SG51b5wB3Ynzio9m+MGk1LMJ2Vr9zSCUkZ8U 8BBNzw/8RTehOhUCiJP09JXgHOu0rAvkCzSnCAqlSJLm82oXP8/XkqT+pmleMmLwBtuv KIEvr+9UCUCnK/3vw28X3UF0lKgHMT9OJ1Ziw=
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Nikolai Weibull <now@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 22:14, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Bart Schaefer
>> <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Nikolai put a lot of effort into the current version and as we're all
>>> volunteers here I can't fault him for not wanting to expend effort on
>>> gutting it. In the same way that the bash variant is good enough for
>>> you, what he's contributed is presently working the way he prefers. If
>>> no one else is available to produce an alternative, well, that happens
>>> sometimes with a volunteer work force.
>> That's not the case, I volunteered myself to do that, but what's the
>> point if he is going to reject the patches?
>> Again, I did volunteer, didn't you see the link on the mail you just replied?
>>>  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.zsh.devel/22480
> Please stop trying to rewrite history. It’s not Git-like. I can
> quote history too:
I don't see anywhere there that you would be willing to accept a patch
that makes a compromise. Did I miss that part?
> I don’t know how much of the rest of the thread you didn’t read, but I
> did actually solve the problem:
Actually I saw that mail by looking at the archives, but I didn't
notice the patch. I have tried the patch, it's still *dead slow* for
me. Again, I don't think this can be solved without writing new git
plumbing. You need to avoid 'git ls-files'.
So. At which point are you going to be willing to accept the fact that
it's not possible to fix the performance without making a compromise?
One week? One month? This issue seems to have been going on for
Messages sorted by: