Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
RE: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@
- X-seq: zsh-users 5851
 
- From: Borzenkov Andrey <Andrey.Borzenkov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- To: "'Karsten Thygesen'" <karthy@xxxxxxxxxx>,   "'Roman Neuhauser'"	 <neuhauser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Subject: RE: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@
 
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:40:24 +0300
 
- Cc: "'zsh users'" <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>, staff@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Importance: Normal
 
- In-reply-to: <86hec1hwo2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
 
> 
>  Roman>     1) zsh-users@ (that's what we specifically talked about,
>  Roman> could cover -workers@ if needed) will be protected by
>  Roman> qconfirm, which means that non-subscribers will be required to
>  Roman> confirm their posts.
> 
> Is that really required based on traffic since saturday? Last
> saturday, we installed Messagewall for all sunsite mails, so the
> spam/vira level should have dropped to a pretty low level. So is the
> request still valid? Have you seen a lot spam since saturday?
> 
the spam volume has decreased but it is still there. Lists known to me that
do use confirmation do not have spam at all. Some other high-volume lists
(lkml as the very good example) have much better signal to noise ratio
comparing with zsh lists.
-andrey
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author