Re: PATCH: Misc. module stuff

[Tanaka Akira <akr@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <1000301184015.ZM11824@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
  "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> By the way, when I added 51xtrace.ztst it was not my intention to start
> a trend.  I think most tests should be numbered *before* 50cd.ztst --
> the only reason I chose 51 for xtrace is that it isn't testing an actual
> programming construct or user interaction.  The tests from 01* to 10*
> are sort of marching their way through the manual checking features of
> major sections -- for which completion certainly qualifies, even if
> zregex does not -- and I didn't want to interrupt that sequence with
> something as low-profile as xtrace.

I see.

> So at some point I think that at least the completion test ought to get
> renamed to a lower number.

I agree.
-- 
Tanaka Akira