Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Or on ReliantUNIX ... RE: Make Failure on SunOS-4.1 (correction)

X-seq: zsh-workers 14111
From: Clint Adams <schizo@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Andrej Borsenkow <Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Or on ReliantUNIX ... RE: Make Failure on SunOS-4.1 (correction)
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:30:12 -0400
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <000e01c0ce54$56d0c0b0$21c9ca95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:25:19PM +0400
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20010426091500.A28831@xxxxxxxx> <000e01c0ce54$56d0c0b0$21c9ca95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Yes. The actual problem is of course difference between configure and source
> code. configure must check for any symbol/declaration/etc using exactly the
> same defines as will be used in code. Else it finds either too much or too
> little :-)

If you have HAVE_TGETENT, HAVE_CURSES_H, and HAVE_TERM_H, then you should
have the same defines (curses.h, term.h) as were used in the configure
test, no?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Or on ReliantUNIX ... RE: Make Failure on SunOS-4.1 (correction)
  - From: Andrej Borsenkow

References:
- Re: Or on ReliantUNIX ... RE: Make Failure on SunOS-4.1 (correction)
  - From: Clint Adams
- RE: Or on ReliantUNIX ... RE: Make Failure on SunOS-4.1 (correction)
  - From: Andrej Borsenkow

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author