Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Feature suggestion for autoload
- X-seq: zsh-workers 25303
- From: "Richard Hartmann" <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Feature suggestion for autoload
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:33:43 +0200
- Cc: "Zsh hackers list" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=57SFRRZ/dWNYCAu/gCb17fKOqhTdzHk6SWgQ3oxjTqg=; b=VdWT5324wJpM6NyLhFrIICvuTpQTeJ4R2tOTGxXxvKveP97yGchGuQdJLQiV+/j2R2 EUF2fAoif6TPBOfFT1kpewPU8eQVFWteOcXDtHy7hoA0iHYLcdoTan+mGmEW/OYJHvgv +K9bPHvADEUz5sRhuBI4J+HqPNMnmtjoxKnyg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=k9OO/8SgNld/EthsQgAA0Hb8FrDQiKnx/qLFSZjlbKt8Jdwe9deQmDp5ytDAsjau06 vkt14W9F6dlxP8+WTMtRbRHhv221F/895j6fHMCHfOiy3Z3dDvnHheBJolJpthdiMXsp urfoiHdyINDM/iwQcqkoIsnFJen5XQvkyfH+M=
- In-reply-to: <080717064320.ZM12597@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <2d460de70807151010m344b9a7dmeaca569f538b51c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <080715183948.ZM10577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2d460de70807161644u483c2c33l53734590710102d6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080717100524.517305ed@news01> <2d460de70807170624t91ccf21i87ab6132210ebe42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <080717064320.ZM12597@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 15:43, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If/when we have ksh-style discipline functions, we can make it a side-
> effect of adding something to fpath that all the files therein get
> fed to autoload.
From what google tells me, ksh disciplines are 'methods' for the
'object' of a variable? Another way of putting it would be that they
resemble hooks for variable handling?
Sounds like a nice, and powerful, concept.
> (Not that we should have that happen by default, but it would make a
> good example.)
Aye. Having something like this happen by default would probably
manage to break a lot of installations in weird ways.
Richard
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author