Re: PATCH: add more ulimit extensions from BSDs

[Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Oct 30, 10:59am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: PATCH: add more ulimit extensions from BSDs
}
} > while sh's ulimit -a describes them as
} > 
} >   kqueues                         (-k)  unlimited
} > 
} > and DragonFly only has
} > 
} >   posixlocks                      (-k)  unlimited
} 
} Thanks for the changes... are we sure that posixlocks and kqueues are
} mutually incompatible, or should we move one to -K via #define's if both
} exist?

It makes me nervous to have two limits on the same option letter even if
they are not mutually incompatible.  Lots of people (including me) have
"portable" RC files.