Re: Valgrind tests (was: Re: Zsh: [7] + 23074 suspended (tty output))

[Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote on Tue, 18 Sep 2018 07:21 +0200:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at 16:50, Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Can you describe what changes would be involved?  Would the test
> > suite remain as portable as it should be?
> 
> I was thinking little different back then when creating VATS, it
> appeared reasonable to have separate tests aimed at stressing Zsh in
> terms of memory usage, etc. I now see that the main Zsh tests are
> putting much stress on Zsh, so VATS should just add vtest.conf, custom
> runtests.zsh, zsh-valgrind-parse.cmd, custom ztst.zsh (I'm not sure if
> the two custom files really have to be different), from here:
> https://github.com/zdharma/VATS-zsh/tree/master/VATS.

You haven't actually answered my question.  Can you, please, explain
what changes would need to be made to zsh in order to implement your
upthread proposal?  It's fine to link to external sources for details
but the gist should be self-contained and understandable by readers
familiar with zsh and its build system but nothing else.

> The readme of this project is unnecessarily very long, the thing is
> very simple, I need some time to approach this again with original
> Test/ in mind.

For avoidance of doubt, I am simply asking for information on the
proposal.  I am not yet sold on it.