Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: We should get 5.9** out soon

X-seq: zsh-workers 49969
From: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: We should get 5.9** out soon
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 17:07:13 +0100
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/49969>
In-reply-to: <bc8a9d2f-013e-4874-8a40-820876df2ac0@www.fastmail.com>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <CAH+w=7YLws5_V21frOYXn52Lv5_vnXxwRSifzZTSrWOupUbjog@mail.gmail.com> <2edcc9b8-6877-40d3-b2c1-158fafeed806@www.fastmail.com> <1b9eb6a0-f9bb-42c2-9ff8-8c9a61e6e4ce@www.fastmail.com> <526109583.788642.1648724722076@mail2.virginmedia.com> <17292100-61f9-4183-8d04-6f8443f3c2f7@www.fastmail.com> <bc8a9d2f-013e-4874-8a40-820876df2ac0@www.fastmail.com>

On Sat, 2022-04-02 at 17:42 -0500, dana wrote:
> Re: 5.9 vs 6.0, based on the discussion here and on IRC it seems like we
> have two strong 5.9s (Daniel and Axel), one weak 5.9 (Matthew), and two
> weak 6.0s (pws and Bart). Mikael and i are indifferent. Please let me
> know if i've misinterpreted anyone's position. If not, i think the 5.9s
> have it so far.

Yes, sounds like we should stick with 5.9.

pws

References:
- We should get 5.9** out soon
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: We should get 5.9** out soon
  - From: dana
- Re: We should get 5.9** out soon
  - From: Daniel Shahaf
- Re: We should get 5.9** out soon
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: We should get 5.9** out soon
  - From: Daniel Shahaf
- Re: We should get 5.9** out soon
  - From: dana

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author