Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: ChangeLog
- X-seq: zsh-workers 54410
- From: dana <dana@xxxxxxx>
- To: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: ChangeLog
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:12:10 -0500
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/54410>
- Feedback-id: i9be146f9:Fastmail
- In-reply-to: <CAH+w=7YAia4cjAk1Nb=J3HZgM-bwjrbgWyz_Z9LcUJrMRKzWfw@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- References: <f1c6add9-31d0-4995-9f7a-a418e6239b7a@app.fastmail.com> <CAH+w=7YAia4cjAk1Nb=J3HZgM-bwjrbgWyz_Z9LcUJrMRKzWfw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue 28 Apr 2026, at 23:15, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> Yes it does. It's often the only place that the actual contributor of
> a patch is recorded when someone else does the git commit.
i feel like people should be setting the author correctly when they do
that (and i thought they were). but ok
it looks like the last time we back-ported things (5.8.1) i manually
fixed the change-log entries during cherry-picking. but it was like five
commits so not too bothersome. doing it for twenty or fifty or w/e isn't
as appealing tbh...
dana
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author