On ÐÑÑÐÐÑÐ 09 ÑÐÐÐÑÑ 2009 15:41:54 Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:58, Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Arranging for this always to be updated in CVS on all commits is > > another job I would leave to someone else, but provided you "make" > > and re-commit it will work. > > I have literally no cvs-fu left. Would do it for svn or git, but with > cvs, I fear I > will have to call on the subscribers-at-large for someone to write > the script and to tell us how to hook it. > I'd really prefer SVN or GIT as well. SVN should be relatively straightforward given that SF supports it. Even if my personal preference is GIT for several reasons.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.