Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Re: Assorted questions
- X-seq: zsh-users 15097
- From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Simon Friedberger <simon+zsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Assorted questions
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:44:19 +0200
- Cc: zsh-users@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YIkvBTl89jSo9N6FevIVAMF4RANySrWsfxf74H1gk7g=; b=rpa3iconArKF0oDmBuo8G2ghqnYQOQoyaE9ZxjaH7bmTbUKV+l6kK7dMhI2rrO33kA +bY91HRolAT21LYetqHARjoKLx/TmRziVgJTAnjz0oopTqHzWiEIcwCctJJZHTUX8RuU ylBnZl2IeF4GcHLna5xezYrLw7zmsFEtuz04E=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MvmZyqti+/rHDz6hIbc/Ia4U5neSXKnB7ZmiDxq04AQ2GJ7s6uXOQq/BuITcCLlnSG R6XhG1o4GhQUbOEmeo32W4eUG79LtuTUvsU5mDZyZ+TUm2cwu0rQN9amFp80qnPrnLz2 UAz9n8ej3hja++3TBuDMtuvy/RPJolffE1044=
- In-reply-to: <20100605192316.GB26738@xxxxxxxxxx>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20100605192316.GB26738@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 21:23, Simon Friedberger <simon+zsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> a) accept-and-hold seems to be the same as <ENTER>^p
Yes, but now it's only one key press. You can't (easily) script a
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âseem to be the same as ^r
^r is realized with the functions you mention. Not having them
means not having ^r.
> I know that there is a subtle difference but I don't see
> how it matters in practice.
If you see the subtle differences, you know why there are
different versions. Just pick the one which you like best.
> 4. Â Â ÂI would like to have some history magic. It would be nice if
> Â Â Â Â^p/^n (or up/down) just switched through the local history but
> Â Â Â Â^r/^s searched through all history entries.
I would consider this useful, as well.
> Alright, that's all for now. heh
Unless you are Swiss (they are allowed, by law, to append "oder"
to every sentence ;), appending "lol", "heh" or similar is annoying
to most people.
You are, of course, entitled to your own style, but generally
speaking, I have found that seemingly little things like that can
make a difference.
Point in case, I almost did not send this reply due to the "heh".
It might seem petty, but at least I am being honest. _And_ I
took the time to explain it in depth.
Messages sorted by: