Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Slightly changed copyright, new test release

X-seq: zsh-workers 2268
From: Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: coleman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Coleman)
Subject: Re: Slightly changed copyright, new test release
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 15:00:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <199610190407.AAA29956@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from Richard Coleman at "Oct 19, 96 00:07:39 am"

> No, the new copyright doesn't bother me.  I would agree to using it on
> the parts I have copyrighted.  But I still don't know if that allows us
> to add code that is under the GPL.  I thought that would require the
> rest of the code to be under GPL (which I'm generally against).  I like

In the case of the color-ls patch RMS would have allowed to include it in
zsh with the modified zsh copyright.  But it is not necessary if we
implement modules.  A contributed loadable module may have different
copyright from the main code.

Zoltan

References:
- Re: Slightly changed copyright, new test release
  - From: Richard Coleman

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author