Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@

X-seq: zsh-users 5854
From: Cosmo <cosmo@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'zsh users'" <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:33:00 +0000
In-reply-to: <20030131114905.GP896@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Organization: IBM Informix
References: <86hec1hwo2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6134254DE87BD411908B00A0C99B044F03A0B62C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030131114905.GP896@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

'Roman Neuhauser' wrote:

# Andrey.Borzenkov@xxxxxxxxxxx / 2003-01-31 09:40:24 +0300:

the spam volume has decreased but it is still there. Lists known to me that
do use confirmation do not have spam at all. Some other high-volume lists
(lkml as the very good example) have much better signal to noise ratio
comparing with zsh lists.



    I think it is obvious now that MessageWall (or whatever it was that
    sunsite.dk people installed) doesn't do its work as it should. Can
    we please settle on qconfirm?


Yup, gets my vote.







Cosmo

References:
- Re: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@
  - From: Karsten Thygesen
- RE: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@
  - From: Borzenkov Andrey
- Re: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@
  - From: 'Roman Neuhauser'

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author