Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Re: setopt interactivecomments
- X-seq: zsh-users 18733
- From: shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: setopt interactivecomments
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 19:51:45 -0400
- Cc: Zsh Users <zsh-users@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=avbOJRku+Y8pTqtYMbengw+pWBm82+qp3FuTs4OFBLo=; b=K1HuECuOQ4gi+FAUPObCBkdCtJbumCoct7mkCjDXP55lXbFoEZt3kzf3EPeKP2Snjs Bz1XBO9EAwzI7ucGjWnzctbpebQYLWN1etUfJKBIco+eSHQkqF7azZ0XpZROy+kKSChu AMuD7ErhhB+tMp7ueqfqzxxVzO+wdhkP2xTDLjVH4wo/QEdMbDL/xvQKU7qtVYTvusRI DFtVRaEENYKAA2OILUBF2n6IJxeUOyPN/n2yEONicDZZeC2cF/zspKcxV665x0MMfVwW CpOG7S+GMVmqH9Hrk0t1qaVOGJpcQ4gMJ75uRXvt5ugsEbc83lVm5vW+z94EUdfdqIfo tG3A==
- In-reply-to: <140417154855.ZM22920@torch.brasslantern.com>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <CAH_OBicpVKS-URnd-Gq=gj+qc6OhDCqf0mgDfVcda27mEEfUKg@mail.gmail.com> <140416102727.ZM19090@torch.brasslantern.com> <CAH_OBic7sX1Oc4VWn2KvX40smbRB6A7w8QGXLvPfZLD=CHMddQ@mail.gmail.com> <534FE710.email@example.com> <140417123722.ZM22179@torch.brasslantern.com> <5350494F.firstname.lastname@example.org> <CAH_OBiczp40H=mbquk248g0EQdnZrjWi1tZ0zP4iWrCyy5mjUg@mail.gmail.com> <140417154855.ZM22920@torch.brasslantern.com>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Bart Schaefer
> On Apr 17, 6:07pm, shawn wilson wrote:
> } As for this (and other 'features') I suppose I'd expect package
> } maintainers in Linux to make it as close to what you'd get in bash as
> } possible and the core package to come with configs to get as close to
> } what sh does by default.
> How does that make sense? If you want "as close to what sh does by
> default" just *use bash*, don't reconfigure things that aren't bash.
> Unless for some reason you can't install bash, which is why zsh behaves
> differently if you name it "sh" instead, so you don't have to worry
> about otherwise mucking its configuration to make it bash-like.
I use zsh because of the zle stuff and (much better) completion and
OMZ and other stuff. I still expect it to behave a certain way.
Basically, I like it for my main shell because I can twist it in ways
that would be much harder (or impossible) in bash (and because BashIt
has a way to go before they're near OMZ).
Messages sorted by: