Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: bashprompt license (was Re: PATCH: prompt fun)

X-seq: zsh-workers 8161
From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: bashprompt license (was Re: PATCH: prompt fun)
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 14:19:59 +0000
In-reply-to: <19991007142931.D19339@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <19991006215809.A12344@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E11ZB1h-0005KR-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19991007142931.D19339@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Oct 7,  2:29pm, Adam Spiers wrote:
} Subject: bashprompt license (was Re: PATCH: prompt fun)
}
} Just got email from the bashprompt guy saying that there's no license
} on it at all and we're free to use it in any way we wish.

That should be fine as is, then; make a note of that somewhere (maybe
add a Functions/README.prompts file?).  If they ever do get under a GPL
style license, all we have to do is stop copying them into the dist and
make people grab & convert them with the perl program.

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bashprompt license (was Re: PATCH: prompt fun)
  - From: Oliver Kiddle

References:
- Re: PATCH: prompt fun
  - From: Adam Spiers
- Re: PATCH: prompt fun
  - From: Zefram
- bashprompt license (was Re: PATCH: prompt fun)
  - From: Adam Spiers

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author